We Still Believe Anita Hill (and We’re Dumbstruck by Ginni Thomas)

I somehow read The New York Times piece wrong when I first glanced at it yesterday: I thought it said that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife Virginia–she of the new tea party-linked lobbying group Liberty Central Inc.–called Anita Hill to apologize to her. Wow, Mrs. T wanted to offer an olive branch to the woman who had been allegedly sexually harassed by her husband and then put through the wringer before a Congressional committee. How noble of her!

Oh, whoops… Virginia Thomas actually called Anita Hill to ask HER to apologize. As Hill revealed, the voice recording left one recent morning at 7:30 a.m. on her Brandeis University phone said:

Good morning Anita Hill, it’s Ginni Thomas. I just wanted to reach across the airwaves and the years and ask you to consider something. I would love you to consider an apology sometimes and some full explanation of why you did what you did with my husband. … So give it some thought. And certainly pray about this and hope that one day you will help us understand why you did what you did. OK, have a good day.

Yes, have a good day! I imagine it was hard to, though, after that call–which Professor Hill actually took to be a prank. After keeping the message quiet for a week, she turned it over to Brandeis campus police and asked that they pass it along to the FBI.

Virginia Thomas has confirmed the call, saying it was indeed “an olive branch … Certainly no offense was ever intended.”

And her husband probably didn’t intend any offense, either, when he talked to Hill about pornography and his sexual prowess–despite her requests that he not–while she was in his employ at the Office for Civil Rights in the U.S. Department of Education.

If only the U.S. Congress had believed Anita Hill during the three famous days of televised hearings on Clarence Thomas’s nomination to the Supreme Court, as feminists did and still do. Then perhaps we wouldn’t have had to suffer the past 19 years of anti-affirmative-action, anti-abortion-rights, pro-big-business votes from Thomas on the Court.

Imagine the sort of other apologies that would be required in Virginia Thomas’s Bizarro World. Besides women apologizing to their sexual harassers (and the harassers’ wives), women should apologize to their domestic abusers as well: “Honey, sorry my face got in the way of your fist!” And to employers who underpay them: “So sorry I asked for as much money as my male coworker who has 10 years less experience than me!” And to all those state legislators who vote to make abortions harder and harder to obtain: “I’m abjectly sorry that I want to make a choice about what to do with my own body!”

The only apology I want to make today is to Anita Hill: Sorry, Professor Hill, that after your brave public stand against workplace sexual harassment–which put a national spotlight on an issue faced by about 30 percent of working women–you’re still being treated as the perpetrator instead of the victim/survivor. We still believe you, and we always will.

Photo of U.S. Supreme Court from Wikimedia Commons, public domain.


  1. S_B_Edwards says:

    Ginny Thomas' language is so revealing – note that she tells Hill that she wants a "full explanation of what you did with my husband" – "with" rather than "to" – as though sexual harassment is consensual. And, of course, the implication is that Anita Hill was somehow responsible for Thomas' actions rather than, as you point out, a "victim/survivor."

    This incident makes me want to dig out my mother's old NOW shirt which read "I believe Anita Hill."

  2. It's appalling to me that after all these years the harassment continues….

  3. Interesting how with Anita Hill it was "women never lie about things like this" and with Anita Broderick, it was "she is just trailer trash." A little hypocricical perhaps???

  4. Susan Rubin says:

    Thanks Michele Kort for the information in this blog. I have been trying to lose a few pounds, and I think reading your blog may have done the trick. I may never stop barfing! The writing is funny, the blog is great, and the requested apology is sickening.

  5. David Howard says:

    Clarence Thomas,

    Google "Quadri-Track ZCT"

  6. Thanks for writing this post.
    I vividly recall the Thomas confirmation hearings, even though I was fairly young at the time. I remember feeling really sorry for Anita Hill when he was confirmed, because it seemed to me that she had nothing to gain (and a lot to lose) by coming forward and telling her story, and his confirmation made it appear that the committee felt him to be more truthful than she was.
    In the ensuing years I've fought my own battle with workplace discrimination and harrassment. I sued my former employer several years ago, and after several years of legal wrangling, I ultimately won. Since then I've moved on to a different career, and put those terrible years behind me. I can empathize with Anita Hill right now; I can only imagine how I would feel if my former boss's wife called me up today to demand an apology to her husband. Even though I go for weeks on end now without thinking back about those horrible times, I am sure a request like that would make me physically ill.

Speak Your Mind


Error, no Ad ID set! Check your syntax!