Long Island Murders: Sex Trafficking Ring Involved?

The discovery of ten dead bodies in a marsh in Long Island, at least four of them women who had some involvement with the sex trade, has been making national headlines. Police and reporters are calling it the work of a serial killer, publishing a detailed profile of him in The New York Times today:

He is most likely a white male in his mid-20s to mid-40s. He is married or has a girlfriend. He is well educated and well spoken. He is financially secure, has a job and owns an expensive car or truck. He may have sought treatment at a hospital for poison ivy infection. As part of his job or interests, he has access to, or a stockpile of, burlap sacks.

But Department of Justice-certified human-trafficking consultant Dottie Laster is not so sure that a sexually motivated serial killer is behind the murders. She worries that officials may be misidentifying the handiwork of sex traffickers. Laster, who has trained more than 5,000 police officers on recognizing and combating trafficking, was hired as part of a team to assist the Waterman family in locating their daughter, Megan, whose body was found in the marsh in December. She has since starting working with the family of Shannan Gilbert, whose disappearance in Long Island last May is believed to be connected with the murders.

According to Laster, Gilbert and Waterman have the characteristics of trafficking victims–those who are forced or scammed into the service of another for labor or commercial sex. If they were, it could offer another explanation for the murders: Traffickers operate through threats of violence and even murder, which they may follow through on to set an example, especially when victims try to get away.

“We have women from different parts of the Northeast who were drawn there through the same mechanism–posting on Craigslist for prostitution. Like a funnel that brought them there,” says Laster.

Beyond shared geography, there are other red flags that suggest human trafficking. First, says Laster, both Waterman and Gilbert had “boyfriends” who fit the model of “Romeo pimps,” men who target women for prostitution using the guise of a romantic relationship.  Both women had boyfriends who isolated them from friends, appeared to be benefiting from their sex work, and used violence to keep them prostituting:

Megan’s young daughter reports witnessing Megan being beaten, and being threatened and beaten in order to keep Megan prostituting. Traffickers often threaten a loved one because it works. What we perceive as normal doesn’t apply in this world.  Megan didn’t have control of her safety or her daughter’s safety.

Secondly, both women had constant financial problems:

We look at who is benefiting from their work and it doesn’t appear to be them. They didn’t benefit financially from being prostituted. They didn’t have money. They were borrowing money.

Thirdly, Waterman’s “boyfriend” was involved in other crimes, typical of traffickers:

We find that traffickers tend to do a lot of crimes. Sometimes the trafficking victims didn’t know what was going on around them in terms of criminal activities.

Lastly, both of the women were isolated from friends:

In Shannan’s case, as we were going over things and asking for a list of friends, there were none.  Looking for a list of contacts, we found her world was extremely isolated.  If I asked you for a list of friends, you could probably send me a page, maybe several. We found the same with Megan.

When asked why traffickers might kill the women they coerce into prostitution, Laster explains:

You have to understand the schemes and patterns. They operate through fear and threats, and they act on those threats. They make examples out of a few here or there, to make the rest of them compliant. Many tell me that they know of women who were killed when they tried to get out. Sometimes I have victims who get out of rings, and they’ve told of murders, of disappearances. They just disappear.  And if you look, there are many cases of prostituted people who have disappeared without any explanation and their cases are unsolved.

There is evidence in both Gilbert and Waterman’s cases, Laster says, that they were trying to get out of prostitution. Family and friends report that both were attempting to leave the business. Waterman believed she would doing one or two more jobs and then get out.

If the Long Island killings prove to be the work of traffickers, it could shed light on other clusters of prostitute murders that have stumped law enforcement agencies around the country. Of course, as many high-profile cases have demonstrated, some serial killers do target prostitutes. Serial killers may operate under the belief that prostitutes are easy prey, a belief born out by the lack of police protection for prostitutes (who can be arrested themselves when they call for help) and the slowness of law enforcement to investigate prostitute disappearances.

However, a narrow focus on serial killers could be obscuring murders committed by sex traffickers. Says Laster, “If you look at who might be benefiting from these murders, if it’s an organized criminal gain, then the case looks different.”

For more on how law enforcement fails to investigate missing prostitutes, pick up the new, Spring issue of Ms.

Image of Long Island marsh from Wikimedia under Creative Commons 3.0


  1. If these murders were committed by sex traffickers who wanted to set examples, why would they have dumped the bodies in such a remote area where the remains might never have been found?

  2. Didn't get it. Trafficking has a clear definition, you can find it in UN concentions. Non of the above 'red flags' seems to correlate those.
    Why would you try to convince us that trafficking=pimping=violent relationships? The only possible reason for such a line of argumentation has to do with the current legal status of prostitution in the US. If prostitution became decriminilized and pimps & Johns were to be prosecuted instead, it would have been much easier for all of us. Using the deaths of innocent victims to promote this agenda in such an obscure way does not honor us as feminists.

  3. Because they are making an example for the victims- not the public- when they kill victims and make them disappear it makes a very strong statement about what will happen if anyone tries to leave or speak to others for help and reinforces the power they have to do so and not get caught–

  4. MS Magazine is an iconic publication. Please spell check this article or find an editor that is not asleep when it’s time to throw up a bloggers piece.

    This case is about trafficking…but even if these girls are connected , it doesn’t mean there isn’t also a serial killer.

    Kind of a catch 22.

    A trafficker who murders more than 3 girls is a serial killer. It is unlikely that several traffickers have decided to dump their quarry on the same stretch of beach.

Speak Your Mind


Error, no Ad ID set! Check your syntax!