After Cuts to Autistic Caretaking Programs, Women Will Pick Up Slack

As a gangly, nerdy and awkward 11-year-old, I was bad at basketball. I remember being in gym class at school, an orange ball in my hands and absolutely no idea what to do with it. My attempt to make it sail towards the hoop hovering above me, which involved throwing the ball from between my pale, knock-kneed legs, drew peals of laughter from my classmates.

While we had a basketball hoop at home, no one had the time to teach me. My younger brothers, Ibrahim and Anas, have severe Autism, and the experience of growing up with them has made me the person that I am today. The demands of having two disabled children in the house were endless, and many times I found myself constantly struggling with feelings of frustration and guilt, because it always seemed to be about them. I could not blame my parents: my brothers were a handful, streaking in broad daylight, needing adult diapers, requiring a padlock on the fridge.

When I entered middle school, the burden was lightened somewhat when a care worker became a part of our routine. Kendra, who was in her early twenties at the time, would come and pick up one of my brothers and take him out for a few hours, lightening some of the burden on my overworked mother. Kendra was brilliant at calming Ibrahim down, helping my mom bathe him and put him to bed.

After learning of my basketball-related humiliation, Kendra took me outside and taught me how to play. While that may seem a small gesture, Kendra helped me feel just a little bit more normal.

Life with disabled children is unpredictable. I did not know when my brothers would need a new medication, when a tantrum would start, if someone would have a seizure or even something as trivial as my parents being able to take me to the mall. Government services provided us with some stability, and I cannot imagine what life would have been like without people like Kendra.

In the United States, approximately 1.5 million individuals live with Autism, and their care can be extremely costly to families with Autistic children. The federal government provides help through Medicaid, which, among other things, brings care workers like Kendra into homes. But the state legislature in North Carolina, where I grew up, has agreed to cut $356 million in state Medicaid funding, and it is far from alone. Additionally, Social Security’s Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, which provides families with similar benefits, including money to fund medicine, is in danger of becoming insolvent. Despite that, Republicans are aiming to cut its budget back to 2007 levels.

These cuts will place the burden of caretaking back on the shoulders of women such as my mother. Children with disabilities are more likely than other children to live with woman caretakers. The National Family Caregivers Association reports that:

  • 66 percent of all family caregivers are women.
  • Women who are family caregivers are 2.5 times more likely than non-caregivers to live in poverty and five times more likely to receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
  • Caregiving families (families in which one member has a disability) have median incomes that are more than 15 percent lower than non-caregiving families.
  • In every state and DC the poverty rate is higher among families with members with a disability than among families without.

Not to mention that such cuts will take jobs away from skilled paid caretakers such as Kendra, the majority of whom are unmarried women without college degrees. Fifty-two percent of them are people of color.

But most of all, such cuts will hurt those with disabilities. While I understand that we are in tough economic times, I do not understand why the disabled, many of whom cannot speak for themselves, should be the losers.

This blog is part of the #HERvotes blog carnival. Read more HERvotes posts by Ms. and other women’s groups.

Photo from Flickr user attercop311 under Creative Commons 2.0.


Comments

  1. Article quote: “But most of all, such cuts will hurt those with disabilities. While I understand that we are in tough economic times, I do not understand why the disabled, many of whom cannot speak for themselves, should be the losers.”

    Personally, I think the reason why is very clear, although I seriously doubt any Republican politician would admit it in public. I honestly believe that the majority of Republican politicians, especially the wealthy ones, have a very contemptuous attitude toward anyone who is either poor, disabled, or both. Mitt Romney made that attitude abundantly clear in his now-infamous “47 percent” remarks that he made when he thought only his wealthy patrons were listening. Although Romney thankfully lost the election in November, there are still too many Republican politicians being voted into office at the levels of Governor, Senator, and Congressperson. Many of those Republicans have the same contempt toward the poor and disabled as Romney did.

    It’s only one woman’s opinion, but until we put more Republicans’ political jobs at risk by voting against them at state elections, Republicans will still show the same heartless and arrogant attitudes they always have. I haven’t voted for any Republican politician in the past, and I’ll continue to refuse to vote for a Republican in the future.

Speak Your Mind

*