Thumbs Down On Stussy’s “Strip For Likes” Facebook Campaign

The notion that the fashion industry treats women as objects is not a new one, but it’s certainly a preconception that few clothing manufacturers ever bother to challenge. Clothing brand Stüssy, however, has decided to take objectification one step further–by turning one of its models into a stripper.

Sending out a clear message that the female body is a mere vehicle for selling products, Stüssy Amsterdam has started a ‘Strip For Likes’ campaign on its Facebook page, whereby a female model wearing all the clothes from Stüssy’s Spring/Summer men’s range removes a piece of clothing in return for users “Liking” Stüssy’s Facebook page.

Most objectors have focused on the fact that Stüssy’s campaign actually violates Facebook’s page terms, which dictate that “You must not use Facebook features or functionality, such as the Like button, as a voting mechanism for a promotion.” If Facebook shuts down Stüssy’s campaign on these grounds, great.

But here’s the real reason Stüssy’s advertisement needs covering up: The campaign relies on the sexualization and objectification of women. Even if the model is still fully clothed at this stage in the campaign, the advertisement’s whole premise rests on the assumption that at a later stage she won’t be. Stüssy is banking on the pull of a promised naked woman to bring in attention, customers and ultimately revenue. It’s no different from trying to sell a car by draping a scantily clad-woman over it–and even car manufacturers are smart enough not to insult their female customers in this way any more.

Stüssy’s campaign commodifies women’s sexuality even more blatantly than usual in advertising. By positioning the naked model as the end goal, and seeking currency in the form of ‘Likes’, Stüssy is asking Facebook users to participate in a transaction akin to slipping a dollar bill into a stripper’s thong. Stüssy’s message to its potential customers can be summed up thus: Want to see a sexy woman wearing nothing? Just pay us in props and she’s yours.

We don’t want to press the “Like” button. Instead, we think it’s time to give Stüssy a big thumbs-down DISLIKE by demanding that the company ditch its offensive campaign.

Contact Stüssy’s European Headquarters at 49 0 234 369 6640, or in the U.S. at 949 474 9255. Let them know that not only are they in violation of Facebook’s terms of service but that they’re turning off half their potential consumers with sexist ads.

If you can bring yourself to visit their page, you can also report Stüssy to Facebook by right-clicking the ‘gear’ icon next to the Message button. Click Report and then select ‘Scam or Spam’.

Image from Wikimedia Commons users Denelson 83 and Pratheepps via Creative Commons 3.0.

Comments

  1. Thanks! for this article ! Thumbs up!

  2. Awful. Again, woman’s naked body is for sale.

  3. chelsea carmona says:

    the add is so ridiculous it looks like a spoof on other sexist campaigns. wake me up when the backlash on the backlash starts.

  4. Car ads are very much still exploiting women in ads! Surely some of you have seen the ad with Adriana Lima in a swimsuit, an audience of only nearly naked women,and a fully clothed piece of trash in Vince Neil.Also those Fiat commercials.Just saying.Gross.

  5. I saw this last week and thought, “REALLY?? is that the BEST they can do?!” Have advertisers and marketers completely run out of ideas? I am SO OVER the whole “using sexy, young women to sell EVERYTHING” crap! Is originality gone for good? Ugh!

  6. I don’t see a problem with it.

  7. This is why you need to think if being fashionable is even a good thing. One issue with the article, you say half their potential customers. It seems you’re implying us guys would still shop there.

  8. A fair point, Arenior. I am happy to be proved wrong on that point – unfortunately the majority of positive comments, Likes and accusations of ‘feminist prudery’ on Stüssy Amsterdam’s Facebook page do happen to come from male users. But I would like to think this is not representative of all males, and if men – who the campaign is aimed at, after all – refuse to shop at Stüssy as a protest against sexism, that would be fantastic. My focus on female customers is just to make the point that the hijacking of our bodies by advertisers is particularly alienating to women.

    • I am happy to be able to prove you wrong. I may not be in the majority of males, I like to hope I am though, but I don’t participate in stuff like this, and often am turned off a product. The Paris Hilton ad for Burger King caused me to boycott them as a teen for example.

Speak Your Mind

*