Medical Provider Says: Risk of Unsafe Abortion in Texas is Growing

TexasAbortionCropOften, patients wait five or six hours to see me. I don’t like the situation, but ever since the “privileges” requirement took effect Oct. 31, 2013, I have been the lone abortion provider for our Texas clinic.

Lawmakers argued that requiring every provider to have hospital admitting privileges would make abortion safer.

But the argument was specious. Abortion today is so safe that we rarely admit anyone to the hospital, so over time many abortion specialists lost privileges. (To maintain privileges you have to bring business to the hospital and admit a certain number of patients a year.)

All the privilege requirement does is shut down clinics. There are no medical reasons for these laws. For patients’ safety, we already have plans in place in case of an emergency.

The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Medical Association both opposed this legislation. But politicians—not medical experts—wrote this law with the goal of making safe, legal abortion hard or even impossible to access.

It’s working. All hospitals in the Rio Grande Valley refused even to give applications to abortion providers, so those clinics closed, leaving women seeking abortions to drive to San Antonio or Corpus Christi, the cities with the closest abortion clinics. The trip involves not only three or more hours of driving each way, but also crossing a border patrol checkpoint.

None of this makes anything safer for any patients.

Emergency rooms in the Rio Grande Valley are seeing women with complications from surgical abortion, even though for two months there has been no legal abortion clinic in that area. I can only wonder where such women received their abortions, and how risky their procedures were.

At a remaining Dallas clinic, it now takes six weeks to get an abortion appointment; one could make a joke here about planning ahead for your unplanned pregnancy.

All Texas clinics are swamped. One clinic I know of sometimes sees patients until midnight.

So we are all exhausted and all dreading September, when the ambulatory surgical center provision kicks in, another requirement by the 2013 Texas Legislature. This one says all clinics that provide abortion must be surgical centers with hallways this wide, X number of sinks, Y number of janitor closets, air ventilation systems appropriate for operating rooms. Given the prohibitive expense of making these changes, how many clinics will be left?

None of this has anything to do with improving patient care. Patient care is making sure women have safe, compassionate, respectful treatment, and that is what my colleagues and I focus on every day.

Take heed, non-Texans, and keep a close eye on your own statehouses. Texas’ 2013 package contained many elements but often was summarized journalistically as the “20-week ban“—the other stuff was harder to encapsulate. Yet ultimately, those other elements had far more impact, because most abortions happen before 12 weeks. Don’t let admitting privileges requirements fly in under the radar. And Texans, please vote for a pro-choice governor in November.

Excerpted from Women’s eNews. Read the full article here.

Photo courtesy of Ann Harkness via Creative Commons 2.0.

Comments

  1. oh my god. society is soo fed up, that we are going back to the early 60s again. please have abortins safe and very very much in a hostpal, with the very best gynos. Leagealize abortion. There are soooo many good reasons for abortion. Women have given birth to monsters killing, raping and all the like because they cannot and unable to, or will not have them. Its no surprise of texas and their laws. I really hope that no woman or young girl will ever have to face the horror of what women went though in the past. It should never be repeated

  2. Evelyn McMullen says:

    Those who make those draconian “laws” just don’t get it. Maybe when their relatives are injured or die from the situation they have created things will change, doubt it tho. Fanatics.

  3. Margot C. says:

    That’s me in the picture at the Texas Capitol, the day the House was debating that terrible bill. Two days later I sat in the Senate gallery watching Wendy Davis literally standing up for women’s rights while the Republicans ruled that discussion of the previous session’s disgusting sonogram law, or of Roe v Wade, was not germane to this bill. I will never forget those hours (and hours!) in which I witnessed yet another assault on the rights of Texas women to autonomy, health care, privacy, and self-determination. Please, oh please, VOTE!

Speak Your Mind

*