CA Bans Employment Discrimination Against Domestic Violence Victims
California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill into law on Friday that will ban employment discrimination against victims of domestic violence, stalking, and sexual assault, effective January 1.
The law, SB 400, would prohibit an employer from firing or "in any manner discriminating or retaliating against an employee because of the employee's status as a victim of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking." The law entitles victims to reasonable safety accommodations and procedures in the workplace, like changing a work phone number or implementing a safety plan.
Economic constraints often contribute to a victim's decision to stay in abusive relationships, so helping them keep their jobs will allow some victims to leave the relationships sooner. "I commend the Governor for signing this bill, which protects victims from job loss and discrimination at a time when they most need support and a steady paycheck," said the bill's author, State Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara), in a statement. "Victims will no longer fear losing their livelihoods and being re-victimized in the workplace because of the actions of their abusers."
Only six other states and Puerto Rico have discrimination protections for victims, and only thirteen mandate that victims can take leave without getting fired to seek medical attention, recover from injuries, obtain legal assistance or counseling, or access other forms of assistance related to their abuse. A federal law providing these protections was introduced in March by Representative Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-California).
Media Resources: California Legislative Information 10/11/13; ThinkProgress 10/15/13; Feminist Newswire 6/14/13; Legal Aid Society Employment Center 10/11/13; Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson's Press Releases 10/11/13; United States Legislative Information
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case.
UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall.
The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies.
Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .