Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

November-12-13

Circuit Court Blocks Obamacare Contraception Mandate

Two for-profit companies won a ruling by the Seventh Circuit Court to protect them from the mandate to cover birth control benefits as part of their employee's insurance, as required by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The Court ruled on two cases at once, William D. Grote III et al, v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al, and Cyril B. Korte et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al.

Friday's 2-1 ruling blocks the enforcement of the "contraception mandate" and was the first decision to separately protect both the owners and their businesses under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

'"In short," the court wrote, "[the] RFRA operates as a kind of utility remedy for the inevitable clashes between religious freedom and the realities of the modern welfare state, which regulates pervasively and touches nearly every aspect of social and economic life."'

In September, The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled a for-profit entity must comply with the Affordable Care Act's contraception coverage mandate. While in June, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a different for-profit company saying that the company had the right to uphold its religious beliefs and deny contraceptive coverage, leading to a temporary injunction to be exempted from the Affordable Care Act stipulation. The broad ruling of the court and the dissenting rulings by other courts will likely send the issue to the Supreme Court to decide.

The dissenting judge in the most recent case, Illana Rovner, warned that the scope of the majority ruling could enable businesses to challenge other federal regulations based on religious beliefs, hypothetically including not providing time off for a gay man to attend the birth of his and his partner's child, Christian Scientists who would cover healthcare facilities providing only "cure by prayer" services, or denying treatment for conditions cured by embryonic stem cell research.

"Your boss shouldn't be able to discriminate against you because of what he or she believes, plain and simple," a representative from the ACLU told Arizona Daily. "People are entitled to their own religious beliefs, but they don't have the right to impose those views on others."

Of the 79 cases filed to challenge the birth control mandate as an infringement on religious liberty, 64 cases by both nonprofit organizations and for-profit companies are pending. Many nonprofit organizations re-filed even after the Obama administration issued a rule that nonprofit organizations with religious objections would not have to fund or otherwise have any connections to the birth control benefit.

Media Resources: Indianapolis Business Journal 11/11; RH Reality Check 11/11; Feminist Newswire 9/19, 7/22; Arizona Daily Independent 11/12; ACLU 11/11


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

8/28/2015 Alaska Court Protects Abortion Access for Low-Income Women - The Alaska Superior Court struck down a state law yesterday that would have severely limited abortion access for low-income women in Alaska. The state's Superior Court also struck down a Department of Health and Social Services regulation that placed narrow specifications on Medicaid coverage for abortions, requiring that Medicaid-funded abortions be determined by a physician to be "medically necessary." Last year, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood sued on behalf of the Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, claiming that the narrow definition of "medically necessary" arbitrarily established conditions designed to restrict the ability of low-income women to access abortion services. The law was temporarily blocked last July by an Alaskan state court judge. Superior Court Judge John Suddock ordered yesterday that the state be blocked from implementing this regulation, ruling that it placed an undue burden on low-income women seeking abortion services in Alaska. "By providing health care to all poor Alaskans except women who need abortions, the challenged regulation violates the state constitutional guarantee of 'equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law'," the ruling read. "We applaud the superior court for striing down these cruel restrictions on women's health and rights that violate the Alaska Constitution," said Chris Charbonneau, CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands. . . .
 
8/27/2015 Los Angeles Mayor Announces Model Gender Equity Directive - On Women's Equality Day Eric Garcetti, the Mayor of Los Angeles, signed a progressive and inclusive executive directive to take a major step toward gender equity for the city and to be a model for other cities. . . .
 
8/26/2015 Saudi Women Prepare to Vote for the First Time - The fight for gender equality is making slow but notable progress in Saudi Arabia, where women will be allowed to vote for the first time in upcoming December elections. This shift in Saudi law came in 2011, when a royal decree announced that women would be allowed to vote and run in local elections beginning in December of 2015. . . .