Today in Feminist History: Army Nurses “As Vital to War Effort as Ever” (May 9, 1945)

Today in Feminist History is our daily recap of the major milestones and minor advancements that shaped women’s history in the U.S.—from suffrage to Shirley Chisholm and beyond. These posts were written by, and are presented in homage to, our late staff historian and archivist, David Dismore.


May 9, 1945: Though it’s been barely 24 hours since nationwide celebrations greeted President Truman’s announcement at 9 a.m. yesterday of Germany’s unconditional surrender, today brought a reminder that the battles in the Pacific are far from over, and Army Nurses are as vital to our war effort as ever.

The Office of War Information said today that the Army had an immediate need for 9,000 more nurses so that its Nurse Corps can reach its maximum authorized strength of 60,000 by July 1st. Several reasons were given to explain why the numbers need to be rapidly increased despite victory in Europe. 

Many of the troops who fought their way to the heart of Germany, or were shot down while flying missions over enemy targets are still recovering from their wounds. Substantial numbers of civilians who were recently liberated from Nazi rule are in need of medical care in countries whose infrastructures – including hospitals, clinics and doctors’ offices – were devastated by fierce fighting. And now that the war has ended in Europe, there must obviously be a massive redeployment of Allied forces to the Pacific, where sickness rates among the troops as well as attrition rates among the nurses will be greater.

It is estimated that 4,000 of the 9,000 nurses needed will come from those already registered with the armed services, and need only be called to serve, plus those about to finish their training with the United States Cadet Nurse Corps. But that still leaves the Army 5,000 nurses short of its goal, so that many must enlist within the next three weeks. Once the goal of 60,000 has been reached, the Army plans to begin rotating those who have served long tours of duty overseas back to the U.S., and will still keep recruiting, so that even with attrition, new recruits can keep the Army Nurse Corps at 60,000 through the end of the war plus six months. 

Army Nurses have been in the war from the moment America first entered it. On December 7, 1941, there were less than 1,000 Army Nurses, but 82 were stationed at Pearl Harbor. Many distinguished themselves by going above and beyond the call of duty that day. One was Annie Fox, Chief Nurse at Hickam Field, who became the first woman to be awarded a Purple Heart, because “her fine example of calmness, courage and leadership was of great benefit to the morale of all with whom she came into contact.” Though her award was changed to a Bronze Star last year when it was decided that only those who were wounded could qualify for a Purple Heart, her actions on that day still serve as an example of the bravery and professionalism of America’s nurses. 

The Army Nurse Corps was officially established in 1901, with the Navy following suit in 1908. But many nurses were serving in military hospitals during the Civil War, with Dorothea Dix appointed Superintendent of Nurses for the Union forces on June 10, 1861, just two months after the conflict started. The Government hired 1,500 civilian nurses to serve during the Spanish-American War in 1898.

During the First World War, 21,460 nurses were recruited by the military, about half of them sent overseas. Though not assigned to combat duty, they worked in overcrowded hospital wards where influenza could spread quickly, and over 200 died during that epidemic.

Army Nurses have been captured as prisoners of war, subject to air raids, and have had to practice their profession while under fire, so they are entitled to the same respect as any other members of our armed forces. In recognition of this, both Army and Navy Nurses were granted full military status on February 26, 1944.

Though many tough battles are sure to lie ahead in the Pacific this summer, and the worst fighting of the entire war will occur during the invasion of Japan itself, an operation expected to begin late this fall, there is no doubt that military women will serve their country as well in the future as they have in the past. They therefore deserve our commendation for services already rendered, as well as our thanks in advance for their upcoming sacrifices in the drive for total victory.

About

David Dismore is the archivist for the Feminist Majority Foundation. His journey from would-be weather forecaster to full-time feminist began with the powerful impression made by a photo and a few paragraphs about the suffragists in his high school history textbook; years later, he had his first encounter with NOW—in which he carefully peeked in a window before opening the door to be sure men were allowed. He was eventually active in the ERA extension campaign of 1978, embarked on a cross-country bikeathon for it in 1982 and even worked for pioneers Toni Carabillo and Judith Meuli.