“Gatsby” Gets Flappers Wrong

The-Great-Gatsby-Poster-the-great-gatsby-2012-34172894-647-960Have you heard? There’s a new swell in town named Gatsby, and he’s bringing flapper flair back into fashion. Baz Luhrmann’s latest cinematic spectacle—his take on The Great Gatsby—promises to be a sensational commercial for Prada and Brooks Brothers, who partnered with Luhrmann’s wife, costume designer Catherine Martin, on the film’s clothing.

But if you think flappers were only about drop-waist dresses, fox furscloche hats and excessive celebration, you’re missing the point. The trouble with Gatsby is, as beautifully as F. Scott Fitzgerald describes the opulent world of 1920s high society in his novel, he gets flappers all wrong. That’s because he portrays this liberated “New Woman” through the eyes of men.

Through their writings, Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald—the young, glamorous literary couple du jour—defined the Jazz Age as we know it. Scott declared his Southern belle wife, whom he married in 1920, “the first American flapper.” The inspiration for Daisy Buchanan in The Great Gatsby, Zelda was known for her wild antics, like drunkenly jumping, fully clothed, into the fountain at New York’s Plaza Hotel.

In her June 1922 piece for Metropolitan Magazine called “Eulogy on the Flapper,” 22-year-old Zelda only hints at the radical edge of the flapper movement:

The Flapper awoke from her lethargy of sub-deb-ism, bobbed her hair, put on her choicest pair of earrings and a great deal of audacity and rouge and went into the battle. She flirted because it was fun to flirt and wore a one-piece bathing suit because she had a good figure, she covered her face with powder and paint because she didn’t need it and she refused to be bored chiefly because she wasn’t boring. She was conscious that the things she did were the things she had always wanted to do.

But in the 1925 novel The Great Gatsby, Scott depicted a more dire view of flappers. Narrated by a man, the cautionary tale seems to warn against the wiles of The New Woman—the feminist ideal of an educated and sexually liberated woman that emerged in the 1900s. So instead of intelligent, independent women telling their own stories of rebelling and rejecting their mother’s values, you have male war buddies sharing how vapid, spoiled socialites carelessly wrecked their lives. In “A Feminist Reading of the Great Gatsby,” Soheila Pirhadi Tavandashti points out the pattern:

The novel abounds in minor female characters whose dress and activities identify them as incarnations of the New Woman, and they are portrayed as clones of a single, negative character type: shallow, exhibitionist, revolting and deceitful. For example, at Gatsby’s parties we see insincere, ‘enthusiastic meetings between women who never knew each other’s names,’ as well as numerous narcissistic attention-seekers in various stages of drunken hysteria.  … a drunken young girl who has her ‘head stuck in the pool’ to stop her from screaming; and two drunken young wives who refuse to leave the party until their husbands, tired of the women’s verbal abuse, ‘lifted [them] kicking into the night.’

Indeed, Zelda, who was ultimately diagnosed with schizophrenia and died at an insane asylum, spent most of her marriage struggling to define herself as an artist and her own person. Her husband copied liberally from her journals and letters for his novels. When she finally wrote an autobiographical novel of her marriage in 1932, Save Me the Waltz, he edited out several of the stories that he intended to use for his own, 1934’s Tender Is the Night.

But Zelda, as fearless and trail-blazing as she was, can’t even embody the flapper movement fully. For one, it was not all white women, as NYU’s Modern America reports: “For the time being, the bob and the entire Flapper wardrobe, united blacks and whites under a common hip-culture.” Secondly, the flapper’s rebellion against Victorian sexual mores didn’t start among the high-society debutantes but in “working-class neighborhoods and radical circles in the early 1900s before it spread to middle-class youth and college campuses.”

The flapper movement wasn’t simply a fashion trend, as Emily Spivack at Smithsonian.com’s Threaded blog explains; it was a full-blown, grassroots feminist revolution. After an 80-year campaign by suffragists, women were finally granted the right to vote in the United States in 1920, when the 19th Amendment was passed. When the U.S. entered World War I in April 1917, many women entered the workforce, and when the soldiers returned in November 1918, their female counterparts were reluctant to give up their jobs.

As a result, young, unmarried women experienced far greater financial independence than they’d ever had before. Bicycles, and then cars, allowed them to get around town without a male escort. The spread of electric lighting allowed nightclubs to flourish, just as the Prohibition Amendment of 1919 forced them to go underground. Drinking at illegal “speakeasies” became a thrilling part of flapper culture.

Inspired by Cubist art and Art Nouveau haute couture, flappers rejected the dramatic, hyper-feminine S-shaped Edwardian silhouette created by tight, time-consuming corsets for sheath dresses that gave them boxy boyish shapes. This straight up-and-down figure was so extreme that curvier women went out of their way to squeeze into girdles and bandage their breasts flat. These radical women pushed the boundaries of androgyny even further by chopping off their long Edwardian locks for bobbed hairstyles.

At the same time, flappers revealed a shocking amount of skin. The older generation was absolutely outraged by the site of bare knees and arms, which flappers would highlight with loads of bangles. They were also appalled by the red lips, rouged cheeks and kohl-lined eyes of flappers, as previously only prostitutes had worn makeup. So flappers were derided for being both too masculine and too titillating.

Importantly, most flappers felt no particular hurry to get married, since they were working and able to provide for themselves. They dated casually, flirting, kissing, petting, and even had sex with men they had no interest in committing to. It’s not surprising that artistic men like Fitzgerald would find them so attractive—and terrifying enough to make them the center of his novel cautioning against self-indulgence and hedonism.

The Flapper Magazine, which began publishing in 1922, used the tag line, "Not for Old Fogies." This issue brazenly depicts a woman playing football, a manly activity.

Flapper fashion had lost its edge by the mid-1920s, when department stores and mail-order companies had discovered the money-making potential of this radically new look. It wasn’t long before the Great Wall Street Crash of 1929, which led to the Great Depression of the 1930s, crushed the fun, free spirit of Jazz Age, forcing men and women alike to get less materialistic and more practical about money.

But the flapper’s influence on American culture could not be undone. She rejected the notion that women should be submissive and keep to their “separate sphere” of the home. She proved that women could work and live independent from men—and party just as hard. She opened up new conversations about dating, sexuality and sexually transmitted diseases.

Keep all this in mind while you watch the new Gatsby. Like the 1926 Sears catalog, Hollywood is exploiting an ever-popular cultural phenomenon to sell you something. These vain, manipulative characters wrecking havoc onscreen in their fabulous Prada shifts are not the true flappers.

Cover of Flapper magazine from 1922, showing actor Billie Dove in football uniform, from Wikimedia Commons

This is an edited version of a longer piece with more illustrations at Collectors Weekly.



  1. 90s attitude in a 50s skirt says:

    A wonderful, fascinating read. I always picture my wild great, great Aunt as a flapper.

  2. English Teacher says:

    I’m sorry, but you have things a bit mixed up. I’m not sure where you heard that Zelda was the inspiration for Daisy, and while there are shades of F. Scott’s life throughout Gatsby nothing is as obvious as you imply. Further, the argument can be made and should be considered that F. Scott wrote these female characters in a way to reveal the way society had trapped them into taking on very limited roles with little ownership over their selves. The women of Gatsby were never supposed to be “flappers.” None of the female characters in the novel are educated or liberated “New Women,” and the portrayal of them in the book is a sad one indeed, that should reflect the fact that they were not liberated from the traditional societal roles. The fashion is a facade- flapper fashion was trendy and you didn’t have to be liberated to want to be at the top of the latest trends. Go back to the text, first.

  3. Hollywood IS the history of men looking at women. It is almost crazy to expect to see anything else…

  4. Another view of “The Great Gatsby” is to look at Zelda in the context of Therese Anne Flowler’s new novel, “Z – A Novel of Zelda Fitzagerald”. I found that the Zelda in this novel was trying to find her way in F.Scott’s world and finding that her husband and the other men in it were always keeping her as the help mate, drinking buddy, in whole, in the very traditional role she had grown up with. Ms. Flowler suggests that Zelda was bipolar not schizophrenic as F. Scott and the doctors (all men) told the entire world. I have really lost any respect I had for F. Scott since reading this book. I do like to read “The Great Gatsby” as a one view of the 1920’s as the role of women began the changes that have led to advances our society today.

  5. Fitzgerald was in awe of brassy women and was famously known to prefer deferring to aggressive women in his romantic relationships. Yes, the female characters in “The Great Gatsby” were painted in an unsympathetic way but what Lisa Hix fails to mention, is that the male characters don’t fare any better.

    Even the main character, Gatsby, is looked upon as pitiful, in some scenes and a damaged person who is willing to break the law, just to win a woman who will never be truly available to him, in others. What’s worse, readers come to even question the point of a rule of law that allows privileged, familied people to slip out the back door, when they commit a questionable act, while the blame is, often, totally heaped upon, ethnically non-white or those not from dynastic families, “upstarts”.

    “The Great Gatsby” is a novel mostly about class issues, in a country that consistently convinces itself — even did in 1925 — that class issues don’t exist here, in The USA. So yes, questions about gender expectations and who has predominantly established them, over the years, is relevant to “…Gatsby” but only because gender issues is indivisible from issues of class.

Speak Your Mind


Error, no Ad ID set! Check your syntax!