Social Services Cuts Will Mean More Women Stop Working—and Maybe That’s the Point

The current federal administration is very pro-family—they tell us that all the time. One of JD Vance’s first public appearances as vice president was his speech at the antiabortion March for Life rally in January 2025, where he called for more births in the U.S. and framed his agenda as both “pro-life” and “pro-family.” Trump reaffirmed that position in March, where he reiterated that this was a pro-family administration.

But at the start of this year, on Jan. 6, 2026, alleging concerns about fraud in state-run social services programs (even though the only concerns that have been raised—not proven—are in Minnesota), the Trump-Vance administration’s U.S. Department of Health and Human Services suspended three programs that provide support to children—not only in Minnesota, but also in California, Colorado, New York and Illinois. Those states, all led by Democrats, will lose access to billions in funding through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, the Child Care and Development Fund, and the Social Services Block Grant program. To be clear, these funds are the backbone of services-provision for families living in poverty in most communities, Republicans and Democrats alike.

This announcement comes days after the administration moved to eliminate a rule that had capped childcare copayments for low‑income families at 7 percent of their income.

It also comes after last year’s efforts to eliminate support for Head Start, quality and affordable education and other services for young children living in poverty.

All this from the pro-family party.

Survivors Know the Signs of Abuse—And Marjorie Taylor Greene Finally Sees Them in Trump

Many survivors have recognized Donald Trump’s abusive behavior for years. Now, remarkably, Marjorie Taylor Greene says she sees it too.

Her recent break with the president is a study in what it takes to leave an abusive relationship: recognizing the harm, planning for the fallout and relying on a network of support. Greene believed Trump’s promises, endured his public berating and faced an avalanche of threats when she dared to oppose him. Yet she left anyway—because her constituents told her they had her back. Survivors understand that moment well: the instant when the fear of staying finally outweighs the fear of leaving. And in this political season, their hard-won wisdom offers a roadmap not only for those trapped in abusive homes, but for a country grappling with a leader who uses the same tactics to consolidate power.

Survivors Know Donald Trump’s Type

As someone who has worked in the field of intimate partner violence for 30 years, Donald Trump has felt familiar to me—and not in a good way.

When you are good, you are in a wonderful romance: (“Women love me.”)

When you step out of line, you are crazy and no one will believe anything you say. (“Kamala Harris is mentally disabled.”)

If you leave, you’ll be sorry. (“If I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath.)