Instead of ignoring or making fun of us single people, listen to us.
JD Vance’s incendiary comments about the Democratic Party being run by “miserable” single “childless cat ladies” has struck a major nerve. Political contests incentivize wild claims by people like Vance who are desperate for attention and power. In response, defenses in favor of Vice President Kamala Harris point out that she is a parent because of her stepchildren, which puts her in the same class as George Washington, a founding stepfather.
There’s less attention defending those of us who truly are single cat ladies. Nearly 20 years ago, social scientists Bella DePaulo and Wendy Morris aptly described singlism: the prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination toward singles. Since their article, the number of single households has only been growing. Instead of ignoring or making fun of us single people, listen to us.
Singlism is not partisan. The stereotypes singlism engenders make many policies and practices across parties unjust. I saw this during the pandemic when many public health guidances and policies failed to reflect the reality of the 27.6 percent of single-person households.
Living alone during the pandemic was neither better nor worse than living with others, but the degree of isolation was exponentially different. We had to contend with what to do in case of illness and were frustrated by an exclusionary public narrative. Still, there were also benefits, such as not having to engage in caregiving, reduced risk of infection or transmission, and not having to adapt to others.
Singlism is not partisan. The stereotypes singlism engenders make many policies and practices across parties unjust.
As a psychologist and single cat lady at the start of the pandemic, I recognized how the ongoing social restrictions did not seem to consider the reality of single, non-elderly people. I joined forces with a single dog lady, and we designed the ‘Living Alone During the Pandemic’ study. Within this study, we interviewed single people of all genders across the country.
Our single participants desired some public recognition of their experience: public health advice tailored toward single households and ways to connect with others in the same experience. We were repeatedly told by participants how grateful they were that someone was asking for their perspective.
As a psychologist and single cat lady at the start of the pandemic, I recognized how the ongoing social restrictions did not seem to consider the reality of single, non-elderly people.
Singlism bias and stereotyping extends to other areas of government and policy. With women’s healthcare on the ballot, our sexuality and choices about whether or not to have children have been under heightened scrutiny.
The discourse over student loan forgiveness during the Biden administration failed to mention single people, or how it would help us despite us paying a higher proportion of taxes than our married counterparts. We gladly pay taxes that support K-12 education, even though we have only an indirect benefit. Childcare tax credits and the tax deductions for dependent children are worth the investment. Though I would not benefit from Biden’s policy personally, my partner, a single cat dad, would benefit and so would many married people.
I am privileged to live in a time where I do not have to marry for my economic survival, the way our foremothers often had to. Now, it is time to get rid of singlism. Single people serve their communities, have meaningful careers, benefit their families as aunts and uncles and are active participants in their faith communities. Do not use us to get attention on the news, and do not forget about us when you make policy.
Up next:
U.S. democracy is at a dangerous inflection point—from the demise of abortion rights, to a lack of pay equity and parental leave, to skyrocketing maternal mortality, and attacks on trans health. Left unchecked, these crises will lead to wider gaps in political participation and representation. For 50 years, Ms. has been forging feminist journalism—reporting, rebelling and truth-telling from the front-lines, championing the Equal Rights Amendment, and centering the stories of those most impacted. With all that’s at stake for equality, we are redoubling our commitment for the next 50 years. In turn, we need your help, Support Ms. today with a donation—any amount that is meaningful to you. For as little as $5 each month, you’ll receive the print magazine along with our e-newsletters, action alerts, and invitations to Ms. Studios events and podcasts. We are grateful for your loyalty and ferocity.