After Repeated Defeats, Republicans Are Trying to Revive the SAVE Act Yet Again

Attendees hold signs advocating for voting rights
A rally against the SAVE America Act outside the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2026. (Heather Diehl / Getty Images)

After failing to advance in the Senate four separate times in two years and drawing opposition from members of their own party, Republicans are once again attempting to resurrect the SAVE America Act (an even more extreme version of the original SAVE Act)—legislation that would require Americans to provide proof of citizenship, such as a passport or birth certificate, to register to vote.

More than 21 million Americans don’t have ready access to those documents, and married women who have changed their names will face additional hurdles if their birth certificates no longer match their legal names. And all of it is aimed at combating a problem—widespread noncitizen voting—that election officials and researchers have repeatedly debunked.

The renewed push comes at the insistence of President Donald Trump, who has made the legislation one of his top priorities. Last month, Trump delayed signing a bipartisan housing package—a bill many Republican elected officials up for reelection in November hope to campaign on—while demanding that Congress first pass the SAVE America Act. (The bill, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, aims to lower housing costs and boost home supply; it will pass regardless of Trump’s holding it ransom, since it has veto-proof, bipartisan majority support.)

Sens. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) conduct a news conference in the U.S. Capitol after President Trump pulled the nomination hearing for Jay Clayton, nominee for Director of National Intelligence, and called for the SAVE Act be attached to any extension of FISA, on June 17, 2026. (Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Now, at Trump’s insistence, desperate House Republicans are searching for yet another legislative vehicle to move the measure. “The president has [the SAVE America] as a top priority, and so do I,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told Fox News’ Shannon Bream on Sunday. “We passed it three times in the House.” (It’s actually four: The very first version of the SAVE Act passed in the House in April 2025 but failed to advance in the Senate amid broad opposition.)

“We’re going to try one more time on a budget reconciliation bill, and I think that will be the way to get it through the Senate, and finally, to the president’s desk.”

Johnson claims he plans to tack SAVE onto the budget reconciliation package, in which Congress sets overall spending and revenue targets for the year—despite the Senate parliamentarian already having blocked this exact move last month: During the “vote-a-rama” on a different reconciliation bill, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) offered the SAVE Act as an amendment. The parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough determined the legislation could not be included because it violated the Byrd Rule, limiting the reconciliation process (which requires only a simple majority to pass) to provisions related to federal spending and revenue. MacDonough deemed the bill’s core provisions—requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote and imposing new voter registration requirements—as election policy, not budget policy.

The SAVE America Act would create significant new barriers for eligible citizens who do not have easy access to the required documents. About eight in 10 women change their names after marriage; under this potential law, they would need to navigate additional documentation requirements to prove both their identity and citizenship when registering or updating their voter registration. Students, military families, naturalized citizens, voters with disabilities, Americans who have recently moved and trans Americans who have changed their names will also face new hurdles.

The more U.S. voters learn about those practical consequences, the less they support the legislation: While the bill initially enjoys broad support when described simply as requiring proof of citizenship to vote, support falls into the mid-40 percent range (and net opposition) once voters learn that Americans would need to produce documents such as passports or birth certificates to register or update their registration, and that many eligible voters could encounter new obstacles, according to a recent Navigator Research poll.

Republican Sen. Thom Thillis said his colleagues pushing the SAVE Act “know it’s dead, and so all this is theater.”

The House is in a district work period this week. Monday, July 13, they’ll be back in person in Washington. Expect some SAVE Act theater.

Tell Your Elected Officials You Oppose the SAVE America Act

If you want to weigh in on the SAVE America Act, call the U.S. Capitol switchboard and ask to be connected to their offices.

  • From the D.C. area: Dial 202‑224‑3121
  • Toll‑free from anywhere in the U.S.: Dial 888‑355‑3588
  • TTY (for hearing impaired): 202‑225‑0114

When you call:

  1. Tell the operator the name of your senator(s) or representative and that you’d like to speak with their office (or leave a message with a staffer).
  2. Identify yourself as a constituent. (Your name and city/ZIP help.)
  3. Briefly state your position; for example: “I oppose the SAVE Act because it would make it harder for eligible citizens to register and vote.”
  4. Ask that your view be recorded in their system and, if possible, that you receive a response.

You can also find your members’ direct office numbers and web contact forms at house.gov (for the House) and senate.gov (for the Senate).

Ensure work like this article continues
Donate Now

At Ms., we believe the stories that shape women’s lives deserve serious, sustained coverage. That’s why, since 1972, we’ve reported on gender, politics, democracy, reproductive freedom, economic justice and culture long before the mainstream press caught up. Our journalism remains independent because it is funded by readers—not advertisers, corporations or billionaires. If this story mattered to you, please consider supporting Ms. by making a tax-deductible donation, becoming a member to receive a magazine subscription, or gifting a membership to a friend. Your support helps ensure that feminist journalism not only survives, but thrives.

About

Roxanne Szal (or Roxy) is the managing digital editor at Ms. and a producer on the Ms. podcast On the Issues With Michele Goodwin. She is also a mentor editor for The OpEd Project. Before becoming a journalist, she was a Texas public school English teacher. She is based in Austin, Texas. Connect with her on Instagram and LinkedIn.