The Dangers of Mansplaining Abortion

8511594056_e6798cf306_zEven mansplaining is bigger in Texas.

“Mansplaining” was a New York Times Word of the Year after the publication of Rebecca Solnit’s classic essay “Men Explain Things to Me” back in 2008. Before long, the word had morphed to explain the experience of other groups who are often dismissed: whitesplaining, straightsplaining and, for those who reject the gender binary, gonadvising.

It struck a chord with anyone who routinely encounters the assumption that someone else knows better than they do about their own experience. Like men explaining feminism to women, or white people telling people of color, “This is not a race issue.”

The term caught on partly because it’s funny.  But its consequences can be deadly serious.

In Texas, mansplaining is propelling recent legislation—some of the most draconian in the country–restricting women’s access to abortion.

State Sen. Wendy Davis, running for governor in Texas, attracted nationwide attention when she led a filibuster last summer that aimed to defeat the legislation, which required all abortion clinics in the state to meet the same building, equipment and staffing standards as hospital-style surgical centers—even though abortion is an outpatient procedure. It eventually passed anyway, and went into effect in March.

The number of clinics offering abortion services in Texas dropped from 44 to eight. In the poorest areas of the state, such care is now hundreds of miles away and requires days of travel. The aim of the law was clear: Abortion may not be illegal, but if it’s unavailable it might as well be.

A district judge blocked the Texas statute earlier this year, but the decision was reversed by the Fifth Circuit, one of the most conservative appeals bench in the nation. In mid-October, the U.S. Supreme Court has once again stayed the order for the surgical-center provision to go into action, allowing 13 closed clinics to re-open. But the court’s move does not resolve the issue permanently; the stay lasts only until the completion of the appeals process.

This is where the mansplaining comes in. In the looking-glass world of Texas politics, this legislation closing medical clinics was cast as—wait for it–an effort to improve health care for women.

“We are pleased that women will never again receive substandard care from these abortion facilities,” said Joe Pojman, executive director of Texas Alliance for Life, in an interview with The New York Times.

In fact, legal abortion by a trained provider is one of the safest medical procedures a woman can undergo. And these same clinics also provide much-needed preventative care, cancer screenings, and birth control—so the law meant to stem abortions effectively placed mammograms and Pap smears out of reach for a lot of Texas women as well.

Yet the junior U.S. Senator from Texas, Ted Cruz, cast this as “commonsense legislation” that protects “the life and health” of women.  Texas Gov. Rick Perry said the law would “ensure the women of our state aren’t exposed to any more of the abortion-mill horror stories.”

Attorney General Greg Abbott, running to be the next governor of Texas, defended the law when it was appealed to the Supreme Court. Ahead in the polls, Abbott said, “I’m proud to say there is nobody in the state of Texas who has done more to fight to help women than I have in the past decade.”

His main piece of evidence?

This law, which his spokeswoman described as the result of “careful deliberation by the Texas Legislature to craft a law to protect the health and safety of Texas women.”

Men like Pojman, Cruz, Perry and Abbott have mansplained to women how little we understand about how to take care of our own bodies. Pap smears? Birth control? Mammograms? You don’t need those, sweetheart. Trust me.

It would almost be hilarious if our health—and our lives—were not at stake.

Caricature of Sen. Ted Cruz by Flickr user DonkeyHotey under license from Creative Commons 2.0

LisaMoore

 

Lisa L. Moore is professor of English and women’s and gender studies at the University of Texas-Austin and a Public Voices Fellow with The OpEd Project.

Comments

  1. Rajani Sudan says:

    WELL! Lisa, mansplaining ‘s made everything clear.

  2. The absolute LAST person I would trust is an anti-choice male politician, whether in Texas or in any other state. I really hope that some — preferably all — of these guys are voted out of office in the upcoming election. Women don’t need such men to “think” for us. We’re more than capable of making our own reproductive decisions without their so-called “help.”

  3. Obviously, people cannot have views about certain issues without derogatory terminology being used to diminish their opinions.

    I’m not saying that the justification for the law is valid. It’s not. But I find it repugnant the proliferation of belittling epithets (mansplaining, whitesplaining, straightsplaining, etc) to degrade opinions and basically say “you’re opinion is not of value.” Rather than judge the merits of any statement, it’s so much easier and makes better hashtags to just dismiss people.

  4. Gordon Willis says:

    Fran: Are you saying that to use words like “mansplaining” etc. is “just dismissing people”? But what if the words were actually true? Is it “just dismissing people” to say that they are mansplaining when they are in fact mansplaining? If I tried to tell you that I (a man) understand your problems better than you do yourself, would you think that telling me that I am a presumptuous git would be “just dismissing people” or would it be the simple truth?

    But the problem here is deeper. It’s not just a matter of men thinking that they know better than women what it is like to be a woman; it is a matter of politicians seeking control and attempting to intimidate the opposition. These are men who believe that women are weak and can be kept in their place by a pretence of concern. It’s a thoroughly nasty enterprise, and the implications for the lives and personal integrity of female voters are serious.

  5. I love the term mansplaining! It is simple and humorous, and it is a relief that someone has placed a term on it. For how many years have 60 year old men hit on 28 year old women? Has there ever been a one word term for that? A 40 year old woman dates a 32 year old man, and suddenly she is labelled a “cougar”. It is so rare that men’s behavior is given a single word description, and mansplaining describes a behavior that is common and has never been defined before. I love it!

Speak Your Mind

*

Error, no Ad ID set! Check your syntax!