NEWSFLASH: Bishop Convicted in Child Abuse Scandal

Bishop Robert W. Finn of the diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph (Missouri) was convicted Thursday of failing to report suspicions of child abuse that took place within his diocese. He is the highest-ranking American cleric to be convicted of a child abuse crime in the Catholic Church.

However, he was sentenced to just two years of probation. “Only jail time would have made a real difference here and deterred future horrific cover-ups; anything less will not produce any meaningful reform,” said Barbara Dorris of SNAP (Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests).

The bishop was convicted of one count of failing to alert authorities that one his priests, Rev. Shawn Ratigan, had hundreds of pornographic photos of children on his computer. The photos were of children in the diocese, taken by Father Ratigan with his personal digital camera. According to the indictment, the disturbing collection included “a child’s naked vagina, up-skirt images and images focused on the crotch.”

The photos were discovered in December 2010 by a computer technician hired to repair Father Ratigan’s laptop. The technician, Ken Kes, was startled by several lewd photos, particularly one of a naked toddler. Kes returned the laptop to diocese staff member Julie Creech, who uncovered hundreds more. The next day, Father Ratigan attempted suicide but survived, and was later sent to a psychiatrist in Pennsylvania. According to Bishop Finn, the psychiatrist said that Father Ratigan was not a risk to children.

Father Shawn Ratigan

As Creech and another staff member pushed for Father Ratigan’s resignation, the priest was sent to serve as a chaplain in Independence, Mo. Then, Bishop Finn placed several restrictions on him, including limited access to computers, cameras and children. Father Ratigan, however, continued to have contact with children and teenagers, whether through celebrating youth group masses or Easter egg hunts. When invited to the home of a family of parishioners, Father Ratigan was caught taking pictures of the young daughter’s crotch under the table during dinner.

The diocese’s second-in-command, Monsignor Robert Murphy, who also knew about the photos since December 2010, never contacted authorities until May 2011—more than five months after the photos were discovered. Father Ratigan was then arrested for possession of child pornography and pleaded guilty to five counts of producing or attempting to produce child pornography in August. He faces 15 to 30 years in prison for each of the counts.

Bishop Finn was initially charged with two counts of failing to report child abuse, but the first count, which covered the time from December 2010 to February 2011, was dropped. Bishop Finn claimed he did not know the severity of the abuse during that time period, thinking Father Ratigan had only a couple of child pornographic photos and that they were downloaded from the Internet. Bishop Finn has also said that he thought Father Ratigan’s problem was “only pornography,” citing a letter the priest sent him in February 2011 that talked about his porn addiction.

According to his testimony in court, Bishop Finn delayed contacting authorities in order to “save Father Ratigan’s priesthood.”

Before Finn’s conviction, Monsignor William Lynn of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia was the highest-ranking Catholic official implicated in the child abuse scandals that have rocked the church for the past decade. He was convicted in July of child endangerment for covering up child molestations by numerous priests, then transferring the predatory priests to other parishes.

Will the buck stop with Lynn and Finn? SNAP hopes not: It filed suit a year ago with the Center for Constitutional Rights asking the International Criminal Court to hold the Pope and Vatican officials accountable for sexual abuse by priests.

Photo of Bishop Robert W. Finn (top) from the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph


  1. Bishop Finn delayed contacting authorities in order to “save Father Ratigan’s priesthood.”

    Again and again people aren’t brought to justice as it’s deemed more important to save the perpetrator’s career than it is to protect the victims. In church, in sports… The list goes on.

    I’m very glad that Bishop Finn has been jailed for his part in this crime.

    • Finn did not receive jail time – but probation. He will have to check in with someone periodically, but that is all.

  2. Convicting him and then not giving him any punishment just sends the same old message–that these miserable bastards matter more than their victims do. Only jail time would send the message that yes, the law applies to EVERYONE, including bishops and archbishops.

  3. Looks like the old boys network and corruption in the church is mirrored in the greater community. This SOB deserved to serve time and have the “friendly visits” that pedophiles and their friends get in prison. I’m tired of the Catholic Church and it’s many perverts being above the law. That’s why I left this miserable institition when I was a teenager.

  4. Evelyn McMullen says:

    Why was not the Bishop’s second in command face anything? After all he also knew about the child pornography., Both these men should be facing more than just probation. I hope the jury convicts Ratigan. He has no business being a Priest or in any other position of authority. For that matter neither do Bishop Finn & Msr Murphy.

  5. Why don’t these jerks get the same individual shame and attention by the mass media that Paterno and his cohorts received? If they faced that much scrutiny and public shame, would there decisions be different? I barely see a blip of individual coverage on each one of the priests that pull this crap in the media. If not for Ms., I’m not sure if there would be much coverage at all. We have got to stop the media from reporting the sexual abuses of the Catholic Church as a collective whole and individualize each abuser’s crimes. Maybe then, there would be more public outrage. So far, I’m just not seeing the outrage that there should be en mass.

Speak Your Mind


Error, no Ad ID set! Check your syntax!