When 9-1-1 Can’t Find You: How Wireless Providers Can Save Women’s Lives

Last month, Michelle Miers was shot and stabbed at her home by an attacker. Still breathing but in need of urgent medical care, she picked up her cellphone and dialed 9-1-1. Like most Americans, Miers probably presumed that calling 9-1-1 guaranteed help was on the way. For the 26-year-old mother of two, however, help would come too late—not because Miers was too far away, or because her wounds were already too severe, but because police and paramedics couldn’t figure out where she was.

Miers is one of more than an estimated 10,000 Americans who will die this year because wireless companies don’t transmit precise enough location data to 9-1-1 operators, leaving police unable to locate victims. In Miers’ case, responders were left scrambling door-to-door for 20 minutes before they spotted the apartment building with broken glass in the entryway where Miers lay covered in blood.

Click here to sign a petition urging America’s four largest wireless providers to adopt technologies that will save women’s lives!

Miers’ death is only the latest tragedy resulting from poor cellphone location data: Deanna Cook, who called 9-1-1 on her cellphone in 2012, spent 11 minutes of call time begging her husband not to kill her. It took Dallas police nearly 10 minutes to determine her address and by the time they arrived, they couldn’t find her or her husband. Her family found her dead two days later. In Lansing, Mich., emergency responders listened helplessly on the other end of the line as a woman was stabbed to death by her ex-husband, unable to locate her because she’d called from a wireless phone. Denise Amber Lee, kidnapped from her Florida home and held hostage in 2008, used her abductor’s cellphone to speak to a 9-1-1 operator for a full six minutes. Again, emergency responders could not pin down her location. She was found dead two days later, buried in a shallow grave.

Americans dial 9-1-1 240 million times each year. More than 70 percent of those calls come from wireless devices, and that number will only increase as fewer homes have land lines. When cellphone providers can’t transmit accurate location data to 9-1-1 operators, people die. Cellphone providers do transmit some data now, but it only gets emergency responders within 50 to 300 meters of the victim, which is not close enough to be useful. And with domestic-violence calls from women forming the single largest category of 9-1-1 dials—in some areas, more than 50 percent of calls—it’s clear that women are facing nothing short of a public safety crisis.

Fortunately, there’s already a solution: Under proposed FCC regulations, companies like AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless would be required to improve the accuracy of their location data over five years. After two years, all companies would have to provide horizontal location information (x and y coordinates on a flat map) to within 50 meters of a caller for 67 percent of emergency calls. After five years, the requirement would increase to 80 percent. Horizontal location data helps responders determine the specific address of a caller and get to victims before it’s too late.

Additionally, companies would have to provide vertical location data (what floor of a building someone is on, for example) to within three meters of a caller along a similar percentage timeframe, 67 percent compliance after three years, 80 percent after five. When paramedics are looking for an abuse victim in a high-rise building, this kind of information is just as critical as a caller’s horizontal location.

While public safety organizations, emergency responders, fire and police chiefs have come out heavily in support of the proposed FCC regulations, America’s four largest wireless service providers, Verizon WirelessAT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile, are full of objections.

While the corporations’ top executives concede that this is an important public safety issue, they reject the FCC’s plan for implementation. The technology, they say, is not yet available (though an independent third-party review says otherwise). The companies also argue that the FCC’s timeframe is unrealistic—putting it in place would take far longer than five years, they say, and rushing it would force an increase in the cost of wireless services.

Groups like the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) have criticized the telecoms’ response, saying that “now” has never been the right time for these companies. They’ve consistently resisted FCC guidelines regulating the transmission of location data to emergency responders:

 In 1995, AT&T stated that the then-newly proposed Wireless E9-1-1 location requirements were ‘premature and counter-productive.’ Only seven years after the implementation of the original rules, however, one study found that ‘following E9-1-1 adoption, the ambulance arrives (and thus medical intervention begins) at a point where the probability of mortality is 11 percent lower’ in cardiac patients. … This begs the question: when will the time ever be right for the Commission to require improved wireless E9-1-1 location performance?

At this time, no single technology can meet the FCC standards, but NENA insists that employing a hybrid of available location technologies will help companies to meet the standards (Verizon Wireless, for example, already does this to comply with existing call location regulations). Find Me 911, an organization that’s lobbying the FCC to push through the regulations, has a complete list of these available technologies on its website and insists that their implementation won’t pass costs onto consumers. NENA admits that extra time may be needed for companies to produce wireless handsets with certain technologies installed, but they still call the FCC’s five-year timeline “reasonable.”

It’s time for wireless providers to drop the delay tactics and support the FCC’s proposed regulations. Sign our petition today to urge the CEOs of AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile to get on board for women’s lives!

Photo courtesy of Flickr Astrid Westvang licensed under Creative Commons 2.0.

James Thumbnail


James Hildebrand is a senior at Amherst College and editor-in-chief of the independent student blog, AC Voice. He is interning this summer at Ms. magazine.


  1. James….

    I created this over a year ago and is now on its way to being in stores… this is exactly what you are talking about!

    Lets chat


    • Kenneth,
      It isn’t the same. Why would I always carry your alert thing with me? It is an extra thing, next to your phone, that you have to first purchase and then take with you wherever you go. I bet it also needs batteries that will run out unless people remember to exchange them. And does the phone it communicates with has to be on always? People often switch off their phone. It seems to work only for smartphones, many people (like myself) do not have a smartphone but an old fashioned nokia.

  2. Mr. Libris Fidelis says:

    Well, there is two ways of looking at this. 1) devices being able to track us for monitoring purposes, and 2) devices that tell where we are in emergencies. True, 9-1-1 is for LIFE-THREATENING EMERGENCIES, however, as we have seen all too many times, “the authorities” regularly have said “hey, that’s a good trick for us to use!” There once was a time because we had “party lines” that a person could GENERALLY determine if someone was listening in. That was before the speaker part could be removed! Now with cellular telephones it is totally impossible to determine if someone is monitoring us. And chances are that we are being monitored!

  3. Linda Leeb Duper says:

    You can afford it, the technology exists, and it will save lives. So what’s the hold-up? The longer you wait, the more blood on your hands.

    • BS Friedson says:

      The holdup is that it might cut into the already bloated profits of these cell phone providers. In our country, nothing but money has any relevance to anything!

  4. My local police department advises residents to,program their direct line into their cellphones for this reason.

  5. This is a good idea as long as it is not published in a phone book. Emergency partners need to be able to locate an area from where the call is coming from without keeping that person on line by asking questions in order for them to be located.

  6. BS Friedson says:

    Another example of corporate greed…why should it take 5 or even 3 years? How many victims (mostly women) will die in that time? How can someone use a land line if they are not in their home neat a land phone??? Pretend it’s something MEN need, and we’ll have it within 1 year! I am thoroughly disgusted: the technology exists, the companies just aren’t being pressured enough to do anything about it. They’ll keep stalling as long as they can.

  7. BS Friedson says:

    Another example of corporate greed…why should it take 5 or even 3 years? How many victims (mostly women) will die in that time? How can someone use a land line if they are not in their home near a land phone??? Pretend it’s something MEN need, and we’ll have it within 1 year! I am thoroughly disgusted: the technology exists, the companies just aren’t being pressured enough to do anything about it. They’ll keep stalling as long as they can.

  8. This is already a requirement where I live. It has been in effect for 2 years. The corporate arguments are simply based on greed. Call them out on the injury & DEATHS. of. too many!!

  9. Susan Henry says:

    In I called 911 from a cell phone in January 2006 and was transferred to a disconnected number by an operator halfway across the country from me. My eight week old grandson had stopped breathing. I had revived him but he was still blue. I got a landline after that but now with ATT U-verse it is VOIP. They need the same protections for VOIP as well as cell phones and any new technology that comes in the future. If it can call 911 it needs to be pinpointed!

  10. Rosaleeee says:

    Ironic, isn’t it? That despite the GPS in your mobile phone, the police are more likely to be able to locate you when you dial 911 if you call from a landline. Information about landline locations are available to police even if you have an unlisted phone number, which is as it should be, since often distress calls are “hang-ups” because the victim had to hang up when her attacker noticed her on the phone.

    And wireless providers are fighting the requirement that they make your location more readily accessible and accurate. Like, well, it is too big of a problem for them to care.

    This is a good reason to not give up your landline. Make it just basic service where you get charged for outgoing calls if you have to. But KEEP YOUR LANDLINE until this issue is resolved. The life you save could be your own.

    Also, if you have any presence of mind at all, when you call 911 the first thing you should give them is not the problem you are having but your LOCATION. Even if that is all they are able to get before the phone gets cut off, they will BE THERE. There is a policy (at least, with most PDs) that a disconnected call must be investigated, and investigated immediately.

    Whether you are calling from a mobile phone or from a land line: FIRST give them your address or the closest intersection, and if you don’t know that, give them the closest landmark — anything that can be looked up (e.g., the name of a business) for location.

    I learned this from the time I spent in Rochester’s NY’s PAC-TAC (Police and Citizens Together Against Crime). Whenever I would call to report anything I began with the ADDRESS or closest INTERSECTION.

    Also, take a tip from cop training: always be aware of your location. When you are driving, pay attention to street names — the street you are on, and the streets you are crossing. If you are out driving on the Interstate, pay attention to exit numbers and mile markers. If you have to call 911 while you are driving, that information will come in very handy. Hell, it will come in handy if you are just calling for road service!

  11. Michelle miers was a friend of mine since middle school. If facebook ,google + ,& other social sites can pin point your location i dont understand y 911 cant . my friend died from loss of blood because she laid there for 20mins waiting for help

  12. Alpify.com is already saving lifes in europe…our app send your gps location to 911 automatically

Speak Your Mind


Error, no Ad ID set! Check your syntax!