An unwavering warrior, fearlessly on the side of women, has died.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death on September 18 must be understood as the transition of both an intellectual luminary and an indefatigable foot soldier for human rights, civil liberties, women’s equality and civil rights. She was both a lover of opera and a scrappy civil libertarian. She praised Justice Thurgood Marshall during her confirmation hearings and learned and worked alongside one of the most brilliant civil rights leaders, Dr. Pauli Murray.
An untiring legal champion of women’s equality, Justice Ginsburg and her jurisprudence will surely be the subject of sustained legal interpretation and analysis in the years to come.
Of particular note, she powerfully articulated what the threat to reproductive independence means in the lives of women—especially vulnerable women—including limiting their full participation in society.
She understood that by constraining women’s abilities to be full in their personhood, lawmakers chipped away at their humanity. By denying women control over their reproductive health states infringed not only on legal rights, but also on their human dignity.
Justice Ginsburg was also deeply aware of the violence situated alongside the call for women’s equality—both state and private violence. During her leadership at the ACLU, hundreds of sex-based discriminatory laws that excluded women from full participation in society were struck down or overturned. She recognized the inhumanity in the state imposing conditions that constrain women’s ability.
Meanwhile, she was mindful of the private threats that could be (and too frequently are) visited upon women by boyfriends, husbands, employers, and in the contexts of reproductive health, anti-abortion activists.
Here at Ms., our team is continuing to report through this global health crisis—doing what we can to keep you informed and up-to-date on some of the most underreported issues of this pandemic. We ask that you consider supporting our work to bring you substantive, unique reporting—we can’t do it without you. Support our independent reporting and truth-telling for as little as $5 per month.
As I penned the closing chapters of Policing The Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood in 2019, the Supreme Court prepared for its next term—one that would include June Medical Services v. Russo. As the book came to its end, I grew exhausted by the many examples of both state and private violence inflicted on women over time: marital rape, permissive beatings; unequal pay; forced time off due to pregnancy; prohibitions from certain jobs based on sex; infringements on contraceptive access; provisions undermining the abortion right and much more.
These impediments to women’s full equality were reflected in legislation and court decisions. These were not the futures women imagined for themselves.
Rather, women’s inequality has most often been secured and maintained with the force of law. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg knew this. During her tenure as the director of the ACLU Women’s Rights Project, from its founding in 1972 until her appointment on the federal bench in 1980, she guided the organization through hundreds of sex discrimination cases. The ACLU participated in 66 percent of the Supreme Court’s sex discrimination cases during her time with the organization.
Justice Ginsburg took seriously the human dignity of women and girls and her jurisprudence represented that. She understood the myriad ways in which state violence: physical, economic and psychological undercuts women’s potential and undermines their safety, liberty, equality, autonomy and privacy.
She believed that women’s reproductive liberty was central to their full personhood. And she valued the need for law in dismantling the vestiges of centuries of oppressive common law, legislation and more that constrained the foundational aspirations of the constitution in women’s lives.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg used the power within her reach to elevate women’s equality. An unwavering warrior on behalf of all peoples—but fearlessly on the side of women—has passed.
You may also like:
The coronavirus pandemic and the response by federal, state and local authorities is fast-moving. During this time, Ms. is keeping a focus on aspects of the crisis—especially as it impacts women and their families—often not reported by mainstream media. If you found this article helpful, please consider supporting our independent reporting and truth-telling for as little as $5 per month.