Who’s Behind the SAVE Act?

Billionaire MAGA donors, anti-women politicians and Trump loyalists are the forces behind the SAVE Act’s dangerous assault on voting rights.

A woman holds a sign, "Protect our vote" alongside a photo of voting rights activist, the late John Lewis.
Demonstrators gather on Presidents’ Day, Feb. 17, 2025, in Charlotte, N.C, to protest Jefferson Griffin’s refusal to concede to Justice Allison Riggs and his strategy of seeking to have thousands of ballots thrown out. (Peter Zay / Anadolu via Getty Images)

Earlier this month, the House passed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. If it passes the Senate and is signed by Trump (who has already tried to unilaterally implement such a requirement), the bill would require anyone registering to vote to provide proof of citizenship—a valid U.S. passport, or a photo ID presented with a certified birth certificate. 

This presents a pretty big problem for a large group of people: women, especially married women who have changed their name, a group that numbers over 69 million. If the SAVE Act becomes law, any time one of those millions of women goes to register to vote for the first time or change their voter registration—maybe they moved to a new address—they could be turned away if the names on their identification and birth certificate don’t match.

The SAVE Act isn’t about safeguarding anything. Its clear goal is disenfranchising large groups of citizens, and in particular, disenfranchising women who tend to vote more Democratic

Young women. Older women. Poor women. Rural women. Immigrant women. Black and Brown women. Widows whose marriages were decades ago. Survivors who changed their names to protect themselves. People who’ve always voted without issue—until now.

Three white men outside the Capitol discuss dismantling voting rights: Rep. Chip Roy, Stephen Miller and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson.
Stephen Miller speaks outside the Capitol on May 8, 2024, to introduce the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, with Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-La.) (right) and the bill’s main sponsor Rep. Chip Roy, (R-Texas) (left). In July 2024, the SAVE Act passed the House with a narrow vote of 221-198; however, it did not advance in the Senate during that session. The bill was reintroduced in January 2025. (Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

If you have any doubts about the intent behind this rights-robbing bill just look at the men behind it.

First off, there’s Peter Thiel: billionaire MAGA donor, sugar daddy of JD Vance and a notable Trump ally. In 2009, Thiel said “the extension of the franchise to women” turned democracy into a joke.

Then, there’s Mark Thompson, a GOP-endorsed North Carolina candidate for governor in 2024, who has publicly called for a return to the days when women couldn’t vote.


There’s Trump-endorsed former Michigan Republican congressional candidate John Gibbs, who has praised efforts to repeal the 19th Amendment.


And of course, Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense and close Trump supporter allegedly believes that women shouldn’t vote—or work for pay, according to his former sister-in-law. 

The SAVE Act now moves on to the Senate, which resumes its session this week. I’m urging you to call on your U.S. Senators—Republican or Democrat—to oppose the SAVE Act. And urge every woman you know to call too.

This comes on top of repeated attacks on women by the Trump administration. At the same time as the administration is advancing its pronatalist agenda by offering women $5,000 to have a baby (which, as many of us know, is a tiny fraction of what it actually costs to birth and raise a child), it’s also cutting vital services that support women and their families. Threats to Medicaid funding, which pays for 41 percent of all births in the U.S., and SNAP, which disproportionately provides food assistance to women and their children, have intensified. The administration has withheld almost $1 billion in federal grants to Head Start centers, and plans to shut down the program entirely. And sweeping cuts to Title X earlier this month now threaten to dismantle the reproductive healthcare safety net for millions.

For being “pro-life,” they don’t seem to care very much about supporting living mothers and their children. 

All this just underscores the importance of fighting for our right to vote. One hundred and five years ago, when suffragists were fighting for the right to vote, they told us to go home and be quiet. We didn’t. Let’s not start now

About

Katherine Spillar is the executive director of Feminist Majority Foundation and executive editor of Ms., where she oversees editorial content and the Ms. in the Classroom program.