Female Genital Mutilation in Infancy Still Common, Gambian Mothers Say

Hulay Damba, 55, spent years performing female genital mutilation on girls in her community. Her role as a practitioner was passed down from her grandmother. “It was what I was taught,” she explained. 

Despite years of steady advocacy in the Gambia, rates of female genital mutilation remain high, even among younger generations. According to 2021 data, almost three quarters of girls aged 15 to 19 have been subjected to female genital mutilation, roughly the same proportion as women a generation older than them (aged 45 to 49). 

Surveys of mothers also show mixed progress: When women with daughters aged 25 and under were asked whether their daughters had been been subjected to female genital mutilation, 54 percent said no. But 22 percent said that their daughters had not only undergone the practice—they had experienced it by their first birthday.

Nevada Just Made Teen Abortion Way Harder—Even in the Worst Situations

Imagine you’re a teen in foster care, and you’re pregnant. The father is your abusive foster parent. Nevada’s newly enforced parental notification law means you can’t get an abortion without telling him. 

“The assumption that a parent is always the safest and most trusted person in an adolescent’s life is a falsehood,” said Dr. Laura Dalton. “Sometimes parents are abusive. Sometimes the parent is the perpetrator of sexual assault. For these patients, requiring parental involvement can be dangerous.”

New Mexico Will Be the First State to Make Childcare Free

In an unprecedented move, New Mexico is making childcare free. 

Beginning in November, it will be the first state in the nation to provide childcare to all residents regardless of income, Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham announced this week. The state has been working to lower child care care costs since 2019, when it created the Early Childhood Education and Care Department and started to expand eligibility for universal childcare.

The initiative is expected to save families $12,000 per child annually. 

“Childcare is essential to family stability, workforce participation and New Mexico’s future prosperity,” Lujan Grisham said in her announcement. “By investing in universal childcare, we are giving families financial relief, supporting our economy, and ensuring that every child has the opportunity to grow and thrive.”

Trump Administration Attacks Teen Pregnancy Prevention Just in Time for the New School Year

The Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program (TPPP) is a nationwide, evidenced-based program working with diverse organizations to prevent teen pregnancy. It’s so successful, it’s become a target: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a new policy this summer to restrict and possibly derail its own TPPP.

To receive TPPP funds for research and community programs, all grantees must recognize the “immutable biological reality of sex,” deny “radical gender ideology,” and refrain from promoting “anti-American ideologies such as discriminatory equity ideology.” They must also inform parents of any programs or services that “may burden their religious exercise.” Already, in the U.S., if kids get sex ed at all, it’s likely to be abstinence-only. The effect (and likely the intent) of the new policy will be to make the TPPP inaccessible to those who need it.

Young people are getting the message loud and clear: Religious ideology takes precedence over their health, well-being and rights.

Mayoral Candidates Tout Plans—But Feminist Infrastructure Is What New Yorkers Need

Frantic, I keep checking my phone for the arrival of the New York City public bus I am waiting for. It finally arrives, 10 minutes after the scheduled time, meaning I will be late for school. With each stop it makes, the bus fills with students like me and people heading to work. Women and toddlers also board in force, lugging more baby strollers than I can count. As the strollers pile up, I scan the bus, wondering how many more can possibly fit. It is a Jenga-like ordeal, and I overhear a group of caregivers confidently affirm how five strollers can be tilted, folded and configured to fit in the bus.

This is the silent role public infrastructure plays in action. Infrastructure greets us on our daily commute, provides livable spaces for us outside, shepherds kids to and from school. Infrastructure is fundamental to our well-being as citizens, essential to a functioning democracy. And to work for all of us, it must be considered through a feminist lens.

Urban infrastructure loomed large in the New York City mayoral primary in June and will continue to be a major discussion point through the general election in November. I can’t help but question who is making decisions about urban transportation infrastructure and the people who use it.

Illinois Becomes First Midwest State to Require University Health Centers to Offer Abortion Pills

Illinois made history late last month when Gov. JB Pritzker signed HB 3709, the first law in the Midwest to require public colleges and universities to ensure students have convenient access to medication abortion and contraception.

Illinois joins the expanding group of states requiring student health centers to offer abortion pills—California first in 2019, followed by Massachusetts in 2022 and New York in 2023.

For students, ensuring abortion care is available on or near campus is essential. Research shows when students are forced to leave campus for medication abortion, they face serious roadblocks: barriers in finding a provider, securing an appointment, and dealing with the time and cost of often long, slow public transit journeys.

“Since Roe fell, we’ve worked hard to ensure that Illinois is a safe haven for reproductive freedom in the Midwest and leading the country in strengthening women’s rights,” said Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton. “As Donald Trump and his administration continue to pull every lever they can to rip rights away from women, Illinois is making sure every woman, at every stage of life, can get the legal care they need from providers they trust.”

Remembering the Mother’s Letter That Secured the 19th Amendment

Weekend Reading for Women’s Representation is a compilation of stories about women’s representation in politics, sports and entertainment, judicial offices and the private sector—with a little gardening mixed in! 

This week:
“Dear Son … Hurray and vote for Suffrage and don’t keep them in doubt.” On Aug. 18, 1920, Tennessee became the 36th state to ratify the 19th Amendment when young legislator, Harry Burn, followed the advice of his mother, Febb Burn, and cast the decisive vote in favor. Febb—a college-educated widow who read three newspapers a day and strongly felt her mind was the equal of any man’s—had long impressed upon her son the importance of suffrage.
—California women are far more likely than men to be “energy burdened,” spending more than 6 percent of their income on home energy costs, including utilities for heating, cooling and power.
—RepresentWomen’s 2025 Gender Parity Index (GPI) offers encouraging news: Women’s political power in the United States is reaching new heights, with states like New Hampshire, Oregon and Maine achieving gender parity for the first time in history. But the United States still has a way to go, ranking 77th globally in women’s representation, but more importantly, it lags behind nearly all its major democratic allies.
—Economic struggle, especially among women, is profoundly shaping the political moment heading into 2026. Understanding the significance for female voters is not merely a political embellishment; it is fundamental to securing electoral victories in the midterm elections and effecting meaningful change.

… and more.

In the Ms. Archive: Does Feminism Have a Problem With Femininity?

Femininity has long been the elephant in the room of feminism.

On the one hand, femininity doesn’t just name what it means, culturally, to be a woman—femininity lies at the heart of many women’s own sense of self. And yet, feminists identify femininity as a source of oppression, a straight-jacket imposed on women to keep us in our place.

Texas Lawmakers Are Using Tragedy to Attack Abortion Access

In the wake of catastrophic flooding that killed more than 100 Texans and displaced many more, Gov. Greg Abbott has called a special legislative session. But instead of prioritizing recovery and emergency relief, policymakers are using this tragedy to push through a slate of dangerous bills to escalate their attacks on reproductive freedom, especially for teens.

Among the governor’s priorities are two proposals that failed during the regular session: one that would effectively ban abortion pills (HB 65, a version of SB 2880), and another that would criminalize anyone who helps a teen travel out of state for abortion care without parental consent (HB 70, a version of SB 2352). That could mean driving them, buying a bus ticket or even chipping in towards gas money. And what starts with teens won’t stop there.

These extreme proposals are also at the center of a broader political standoff in Texas. In early August, over 50 Democratic lawmakers fled the state to block a quorum in the House, halting progress on the governor’s agenda—including these abortion-related bills. In response, Republican leadership voted to authorize civil arrest warrants to compel their return, escalating tensions at the Capitol.

This isn’t about one bill, or even one state. What’s happening in Texas is part of a broader strategy to attack abortion funds, criminalize community care, and expand the playbook to end abortion access for everyone, everywhere.

Doesn’t Gen Z Have the Right to Life? Young People Sue Trump Administration Over Climate Catastrophe as State-By-State Battle Continues

At least 137 people are dead after devastating flash-flooding in Texas in early July, including many children. As climate change induced disasters grow more common and the Trump administration rolls back environmental protections, several organizations are pursuing creative legal strategies to defend children’s fundamental right to a safe, healthy and stable natural environment.

On behalf of 22 young people, Our Children’s Trust filed Lighthiser v. Trump in May as part of its multi-case Youth v. Gov effort, asserting that three of the president’s pro-fossil fuel executive orders violate their constitutional rights to life, health and safety.

On July 16, hundreds gathered outside the U.S. Capitol to hear from Lighthiser plaintiffs and members of Congress at a press conference hosted by Our Children’s Trust and several organizational partners.

The same day, the Children’s Fundamental Rights to Life and a Stable Climate System resolution was introduced by Sen. Merkley (D-Oreg.) and Reps. Schakowsky (D-Ill.), Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Raskin (D-Md.). More than 50 additional senators and representatives joined the resolution as cosponsors.

Eva Lighthiser and Lander Busse were also plaintiffs in Held v. State of Montana, in which the Montana Supreme Court ruled that state law restricting consideration of climate change in environmental reviews violated youth plaintiffs’ right to a clean and healthful environment. The suit saw success largely because Montana has a Green Amendment—a constitutional amendment in the Bill of Rights section of the state Constitution explicitly declaring the legal right to a safe, healthy and stable natural environment for all people. Thus far, only Montana, Pennsylvania and New York have Green Amendments. The organization Green Amendments for the Generations (GAFTG) is working state-by-state alongside community partners to get new state-level Green Amendments passed.