Conservative influencers and campus networks are urging Gen Z women to prioritize early marriage and motherhood over education and professional ambition.
In recent years, a prominent strain of right-wing media has promoted a message aimed at Gen Z, especially young women: that career-building, higher education and financial independence are distractions from a God-given calling. This pitch frames delay as danger, ambition as selfish, and early marriage as the moral and practical solution to fix the “generational crisis” of the declining birthrate.
The political right casts falling U.S. birth rates as more than an economic concern: They are a threat to the nation’s future, traditional social structures and Christian cultural values. Across podcasts, campus organizations and conservative media, this narrative reframes ambition and independence as a trap for women.
Gen Z women in particular are the key target audience for this propaganda.
Conservative groups now host several events and conferences aimed at young women, including Live Action’s Young Leaders Summit, Turning Point USA’s Young Women’s Leadership Summit and the Conservative Political Action Conference’s Women Warriors Summit.
In the speeches and sessions I reviewed from these gatherings, speakers offered little encouragement for career-building or financial independence. Instead, they focused on chastity, marriage, traditional gender roles and what they described as God’s design for women’s lives. Their message was clear: The most important decision facing women in their twenties is not which major to choose or which job offer to accept, but whom to marry, and how soon.
Proponents of this narrative often skip over the practical risks of marrying young. Young age and economic stress are both associated with a heightened risk of intimate partner violence, while financial dependence can make an abusive relationship far more difficult to leave.
I’m a Gen Z woman and college student pursuing a career, financial independence and a life shaped by my own ambitions. After spending the summer researching conservative media, I found its messages unsettling: reminiscent of a past when women faced legal and social barriers to employment, property ownership and independent access to credit, and were valued primarily for their roles as wives and mothers.
Although I do not believe this narrative is widely accepted across Gen Z, I worry that without greater scrutiny, more young women may begin to internalize the idea that their ambitions matter less than those of their male peers.
The most important decision facing women in their twenties is not which major to choose or which job offer to accept, but whom to marry, and how soon.”
Delay as Danger
Right-wing rhetoric promoting marriage and family is often derived from religious texts and delivered to a young audience as a universal blueprint for a meaningful and virtuous life.
At this year’s Live Action Young Leaders Summit, the Heritage Foundation’s Delano Squires framed marriage as something written into creation itself: “God’s design for humanity is that he created men and women to need each other; to create, sustain, protect and enjoy life.”
He described this religious philosophy as being at odds with a life built around personal goals and ambition, arguing that pursuing marriage only after career achievements leaves people with “more life behind them than they have ahead of them.”
This narrative suggests that a life has value only if it is centered on heterosexual marriage—and that anything else falls short.
“Stop procrastinating,” conservative Catholic speaker and author Emily Wilson commanded at the same event. “If God calls you to marriage, to serve immediately, love immediately. Do not say, ‘I am going to do it next week, next month, next year.’ You are going to do it now.”
Framing Ambition as Deception
To further convince Gen Z women to prioritize marriage and family over career ambitions, conservative media figures allege that mainstream advice telling young women to build a career is built on lies: that you can be happy without marriage or children, and that putting your ambition first is a noble pursuit.
On the 40 Days for Life podcast, Steve Karlen, campaign director for the eponymous antiabortion group, described “girlboss messaging” as an idea that “independence is everything, men are optional and marriage and motherhood can be postponed indefinitely.” He argued this message only works for a narrow, wealthy slice of women, dismissing it as a “luxury belief” that only wealthy women can afford to live a life without a partner, husband or child.
Karlen’s implicit message is an accusation of selfishness: that women who focus on themselves rather than on men have gotten their priorities wrong.
Heritage policy analyst Emma Waters takes the “luxury belief” argument further, contending that an economy organized around full-time professional work leaves lower-income mothers with fewer choices:
“The whole economy has to be built up around women who want to work full-time out of the office in these rather glamorous roles, which means that a lot of lower-income women, who often do come from very conservative backgrounds and would like to stay home with their children, are put into a position where they do not have that option.”
On The Isabel Brown Show, the Daily Wire podcast host invited college students and TPUSA members to discuss marriage, education and career.
Sage (last name withheld), a chapter president with the organization, described being punished for resisting the “girlboss” messaging, claiming professors and mentors told her she was “wasting talent and wasting space” at their university for wanting to be a mother.
Other guests on this episode echoed this message. Hayley (last name withheld), vice president of her campus chapter, said, “We are encouraged to climb the ladder in the business world because feminists want to be as close as they can to a man. They don’t want to be below a man; they want to be better and equal to a man, but what they’re doing is not the way it was designed. … I personally believe in my faith that I should be submissive to my husband.”
These arguments form a pitch that marriage is virtuous and morally imperative, while mainstream culture’s focus on independence and career for young women is a lie. Thus, the solution is to abandon your career and marry early.
Solving the Birth-Rate Crisis: Early Marriage, Setting Women’s Autonomy Aside
Brown continued this dangerous message in an episode titled “Gen Z Hates Marriage, or Do They?” Describing the rhetoric she sees online, Brown stated, “I am seeing discourse … that the best thing you can do for your life as a young woman is be radically selfish. That your time belongs to you, your job belongs to you, your stuff belongs to you, your vacations belong to you.”
Brown’s guest, University of Virginia sociologist and Institute for Family Studies senior fellow Brad Wilcox argued marriage benefits women: “Women today who are getting married are forging a path into a life that is stressful and full of sacrifices, but it is more meaningful and a lot less lonely.”
Wilcox’s argument reinforces a broader narrative in which women are expected to accept the burdens of marriage and motherhood as the price of a meaningful life. In this framing, marriage to a man and motherhood become prerequisites for women’s fulfillment.
In reality, marriage benefits men: In heterosexual relationships, men increasingly reap greater economic gains while continuing to benefit from women’s disproportionate share of unpaid domestic labor and caregiving.
Conservatives have also weaponized the threat of loneliness, losing value and not being lovable to direct women towards marriage and motherhood. At this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference, Brown echoed and lauded Vice President JD Vance’s words at the antiabortion March for Life in January: “A cubicle or computer screen will never love you back the way your child will.”
Overall, this framing is a call back to traditional gender roles and policies that have historically shamed women for prioritizing their ambitions. This framework also threatens women, telling them that they have expiration dates, after which they become unlovable, infertile and unattractive, and if they don’t prioritize marriage and motherhood, they’ll become haggard, old crones. The throughline in all of this messaging is that a woman’s value lies in staying home and raising children, even if that means sacrificing a career, financial independence and individual ambition.
The Overall Takeaway
Who ultimately pays the cost of increasingly prevalent pro-family rhetoric? Overall, it is a woman’s ambition on the chopping block. Not a man’s job, degree or young adulthood. Hers.
While this rhetoric predetermines a young woman’s blueprint for life, there is no mention of LGBTQ+ families, non-Christians, or anyone who does not fit into the preset template of heterosexual with nuclear families. This omission is not accidental. It is a clear statement that anyone who falls outside of what is deemed to be a moral blueprint can only live a life that lacks value, meaning and morality. When the summit panelists and the podcast pundits talk about “family” and “meaning,” they intentionally seek to head off a future that looks different than their own narrow prescriptions.
I keep thinking about Sage being told she was “wasting talent and wasting space” for wanting to be a mother, and then, in the same breath, watching women who want careers get told their ambitions are obstacles to the roles that they are meant to fulfill. There’s no version of this where women win: You’re either failing your family or failing your faith.
Conservative media romanticizing traditional gender roles is not new. But what scares me is how it’s being repackaged not as an old-fashioned ideal, but as a rebellion and a “return to what’s real” in a world that feels unstable.
It’s aimed at women who are anxious, lonely and looking for purpose, and it offers them (only) one path: Marry young, have children, skip the career ladder, and you will be loved and lead a meaningful life. The alternative is framed as failure.
*
A note from Ms. editors: We want to hear from you for The Majority, a new campaign collecting stories about how reproductive freedom has enabled readers to build the lives they want and need.
Poll after poll shows a majority of Americans support reproductive healthcare access. Yet public debate overlooks the lives shaped by abortion access, contraception, IVF, miscarriage care, maternal healthcare or comprehensive sex education—countless women who chose to pursue an education, have children, not have children, protect their health and chart their own future. What’s your reproductive freedom story? Add your voice. Together, these stories will help show not only why reproductive freedom remains a majority value, but also what it makes possible.
